LO3 Evaluation of the script (me)

LO3 Evaluation of the script

How does it meet the requirements of the brief?

Our radio show meets the requierments of the breif as we have met  have included all of the segments that were specified in the breif. We have included voice actors and actors in our nes and topical disscusion feature section and in post production we have added in bedding music and jingle/theme music.

How does it meet the requirements of the purpose?

Our product meets its purpose as it appeals to our target audience and uses colloquial language as it is a local radio station. Our radio station meets the requirements to entertain as it entertains our listeners through the use of relatable content and current music, this also meets the conventions of the brief as it

How our script meets the conventions

As you can see wea are using a peer to peer mode of address in this section of script, which is fitting with the conventions of a chatty breakfast radio show simialr to BBC w breakfast show that i looked into for my LO1.

To conform with the conventions of a local rado show we have included local news in our news segments to best appeal to the target audience.



These examples aswell as many others is why if feel our script has met the codes and conventions.

Outline strengths

The radio show has strong dialogue as it is very back and fort to keep the audience engaged. Our content is tailored towards our demographic of 16-24 year olds and uni students as we use current indie music, whoch are from local bands. This script also meets the goals which was set out of by the breif as it is an appropriate local radio show.

Outline weaknesses

The only weakneses of the script is that when some of the dialogie was split up beetween the presenters, we ntices that there were some continuity in the dialogue particualry hen reading our stories and letters that were sent in. 

Changes/amends

We made small changes and adjustments to our script after we received client feedback from our client. one of the man issues were that in the early drafts of our script we needed  to break up more of the dialogue between the presenters, but we amended this by splitting up the larger lines and distributing them between the presenters.